Comments on: Pakistan Army doctrine says ‘Attack First’ http://www.stratpost.com/pakistan-army-doctrine-says-attack-first South Asian Defense & Strategic Affairs Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:17:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: India, Pak hold simultaneous war drills | StratPost http://www.stratpost.com/pakistan-army-doctrine-says-attack-first/comment-page-1#comment-2622 India, Pak hold simultaneous war drills | StratPost Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:16:22 +0000 http://www.stratpost.com/?p=113#comment-2622 [...] some observers in the Indian Army, could validate innovations in the existing Pakistani doctrine of Offensive-Defense, first devised after the exercise Zarb-e-Momin (Retaliation/Riposte/Strike by the faithful) in [...] [...] some observers in the Indian Army, could validate innovations in the existing Pakistani doctrine of Offensive-Defense, first devised after the exercise Zarb-e-Momin (Retaliation/Riposte/Strike by the faithful) in [...]

]]> By: akshay http://www.stratpost.com/pakistan-army-doctrine-says-attack-first/comment-page-1#comment-1040 akshay Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:43:22 +0000 http://www.stratpost.com/?p=113#comment-1040 Isn't it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a 'doctrine'. Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn't think his army was ready for an attack Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis. Isn’t it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a ‘doctrine’.

Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn’t think his army was ready for an attack

Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis.

]]> By: akshay http://www.stratpost.com/pakistan-army-doctrine-says-attack-first/comment-page-1#comment-2848 akshay Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:43:00 +0000 http://www.stratpost.com/?p=113#comment-2848 Isn't it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a 'doctrine'. Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn't think his army was ready for an attack Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis. Isn’t it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a ‘doctrine’.

Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn’t think his army was ready for an attack

Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis.

]]>