Pakistan Army doctrine says ‘Attack First’

The idea is to take the battle into Indian territory and get a hold over as much territory as possible. Pakistan can then use this territory as a bargaining chip on the negotiating table.

Pakistan Army

The growing tensions between India and Pakistan may result in pre-emptive action by Pakistan according to information gleaned about Pakistan’s military doctrine.

Brigadier Gurmeet Kanwal, Director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies

Brigadier Gurmeet Kanwal, Director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies

Retired Brigadier Gurmeet Kanwal, Director of the Centre for Land Warfare Studies and author of the book, Indian Army Vision 2020 says the Pakistan army has a doctrine of ‘offensive-defense’, which was initiated in 1989 by the then army chief General Mirza Aslam Beg after the key Exercise Zarb-e-Momin. “The idea is to take the battle into Indian territory,” says the Brigadier, “and hold get as much territory as possible.” Pakistan can then use this territory as a bargaining chip on the negotiating table.

It is imperative according to this doctrine for the Pakistani army to try and punch through Indian lines first, rather than wait for an Indian attack. “They have to attack first. They have to take the initiative here. If they wait for India to strike, they will be left in a reactive mode. As it is they have only two Strike Corps in comparison to the three Indian Strike Corps,” Brigadier Kanwal explained.

The two Pakistani Strike Corps are the Army Reserve North and the Army Reserve South with reports that Pakistan army had created additional formations in the 1990s for both defensive as well as offensive roles.
Brigadier Kanwal is doubtful of the Pakistan Army’s ability to execute this doctrine. “They don’t have enough attacking forces to do the job. Their two Strike Corps are not enough to do this,” he opines, adding, “They rely on missile systems to try and achieve this.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Follow Saurabh Joshi on Twitter @ http://www.twitter.com/saurabhjoshi Saurabh is a journalist based in New Delhi, India who has worked in print, television as well as internet news media. Besides defense and strategy, his past assignments have included reporting from Kashmir, coverage of terror strikes as well as election coverage from all over India. He has a Bachelors degree in Journalism (Honors) as well as a law degree (LLB), both from the University of Delhi.
2 comments
akshay
akshay

Isn't it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a 'doctrine'. Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn't think his army was ready for an attack Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis.

akshay
akshay

Isn't it obvious that Pak needs to attack first. What is the need for a 'doctrine'. Even though Pak has 2 strike corps and we three, why did 300 people have to die in Mumbai last year ? The brigadier must analyze that. In response, in Newspapers, it was reported that the Indian Army Chief didn't think his army was ready for an attack Going forward, if Pakistan needs to attack first, where would they attack? Kargil showed that the Army dint put any effort on that analysis.

Trackbacks

  1. […] some observers in the Indian Army, could validate innovations in the existing Pakistani doctrine of Offensive-Defense, first devised after the exercise Zarb-e-Momin (Retaliation/Riposte/Strike by the faithful) in […]

Switch to our mobile site